Monday, October 2, 2017

trigonometry - (Solved) Trigonometric equations confusion



Okay, there's this simple equation I've been looking into for a while and I don't know why one way of solving it is not correct. See:



sin(2x)+3cos(2x)=0




Well, the most obvious would be to rearrange to get:



tan(2x)=3



and get the solutions from there, and this works. The problem comes in when another method is used:



sin(2x)+3cos(2x)=0


sin(2x)+3sin(2x)tan(2x)=0

sin(2x)(1+3tan(2x))=0




Resulting in sin(2x)=0 or tan(2x)=3



I cannot find anything wrong with this method, except that the solutions that sin(2x) give are not correct when I tested the results back in the original equation. There's probably something I'm overlooking, but I have to idea what. Could anyone explain? I tried to find an explanation to this on here and on the web but have failed so far.



[Of course, there is also the method of equating sin(2x)+3cos(2x)=αsin(x+μ)=0, which confirms the first method, but I really want to know whether there's like an assumption or something I'm ignoring without knowing somewhere in the second method.]



EDIT: Thank you for the answers, but mentioning that dividing by zero is not possible it immediately made me think of something of the like of:



2x25x=0




If we take x(2x5)=0, we get x=2.5 or x=0 which are both correct, but if we go with the 'first method' we get: 2x2=5x

2x=5
x=2.5
which ignores the existing solution x=0.



reEDIT: Maybe what I'm trying to find is whether there is some way where I can 'see' that using this or that method will not be suitable, so I don't have to go back and reject excess solutions which are not valid?


Answer



From sin(2x)(1+3tan(2x))=0,

we conclude that sin(2x)=0ORtan(2x)=3.
The former is not possible, since then tan(2x)=0, and so 1+3tan(2x)
isn't even defined. Hence, we have tan(2x)=3, as you already found through other means.






Before you divide by an expression that may become 0, you need to separate by cases: one case where that expression is 0 (which may not be possible), and one where it is not 0. Let me give you a few examples so you can get the idea.





x(x2+1)=2(x2+1)




Above, we split into the case that x2+1=0 and the case that x2+10. In the latter case, division by x2+1 shows us that x=2 without difficulty. In the former case, we must solve the equation x2+1=0, which has no real solutions (complex solutions ±i. Thus x=2 is the only real solution (and ±i are the other two complex solutions).




2x(x21)=5(x21)





Split into the case that x21=0 and the case that x210. In the latter case, division by x21 shows us that x=52. In the former case, we need to solve x21=0 (choose your favorite), and we'll find that x=±1. Hence, x=±1 and x=52 are the solutions.






Upshot: Before you divide, make sure that the expression you're dividing by isn't zero! If it can be zero, then deal with that separately.


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...