Sunday, August 14, 2016

real analysis - Does fn(z)neq0 for all ngeq1 imply f(z)neq0?




Let zC, and (fn(z))n=1 be a sequence of non-zero functions of z, i.e. fn(z)0 for all n1. Suppose that fn(z)f(z) uniformly with f not identically zero, and f and fn holomorphic. Does this imply that f(z)0 ?



I have been looking at Hurwitz' theorem from complex analysis, but I get the impression under Hurwitz' theorem the condition fn(z)0 has to hold on whole sets of points, and does not work for single points.


Answer



You probably want to also add the hypotheses that fn and f are holomorphic. But as you pointed out, Hurwitz's theroem doesn't work at a single point. It only tells you that if f has a zero at z0, then the fn must have zeros near z0 for sufficiently large n. For example, if you define fn(z)=z+1n, then fnf(z)=z uniformly on C. Now f(0)=0, but fn(0)0 for all n1. However, each fn has a zero at z=1n, thus if you take any ϵ>0, then fn has a zero inside the disk |z|<ϵ for sufficiently large n.


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...