Let z∈C, and (fn(z))∞n=1 be a sequence of non-zero functions of z, i.e. fn(z)≠0 for all n≥1. Suppose that fn(z)→f(z) uniformly with f not identically zero, and f and fn holomorphic. Does this imply that f(z)≠0 ?
I have been looking at Hurwitz' theorem from complex analysis, but I get the impression under Hurwitz' theorem the condition fn(z)≠0 has to hold on whole sets of points, and does not work for single points.
Answer
You probably want to also add the hypotheses that fn and f are holomorphic. But as you pointed out, Hurwitz's theroem doesn't work at a single point. It only tells you that if f has a zero at z0, then the fn must have zeros near z0 for sufficiently large n. For example, if you define fn(z)=z+1n, then fn→f(z)=z uniformly on C. Now f(0)=0, but fn(0)≠0 for all n≥1. However, each fn has a zero at z=−1n, thus if you take any ϵ>0, then fn has a zero inside the disk |z|<ϵ for sufficiently large n.
No comments:
Post a Comment