Does
∫∞−∞e a (x+b)2 dx=∫∞−∞e a x2 dx ?
hold, even if the imaginary part of b is nonzero?
What I really want to understand is what the phrase "By analogy with the previous integrals" means in that link. There, the expression Ja is complex but they seem to imply the integral can be solved like above anyway.
The reusult tells us that the integral is really independend of J, which is assumed to be real here. I wonder if we can also generalize this integral to include complex J. In case that the shift above is possible, this should work out.
But even if the idea is here to perform that substitution, how to get rid of the complex a to obtain the result. If everything is purely real or imaginary, then this solves the rest of the problem.
Answer
Let us write b=r+it. The real part of b does not matter as you have already proven yourself. So wlog r=0.
For shifting along the imaginary axis, we have to employ the residue theorem. We have
∫∞−∞f(x+it)dx−∫∞−∞f(x)dx=∫∞−it−∞−itf(x)dx−∫∞−∞f(x)dx=2πi∑Res(f)+∫∞∞−itf(x)dx−∫−∞−∞−itf(x)dx,
where ∑Res(f) is the sum over the residues of f in the area z∈C with −t<Imz<0.
So the two integrals are the same if there are no residues and if the two integral at ±∞ vanish (both of which is the case for your example as long as Rea<0).
No comments:
Post a Comment