The integral I am trying to evaluate is:
I=∫∞−∞x1+x2sinx dx=∫∞−∞f(x) dx
The standard approach to this is to realise sinx as the complex part of eix and take a contour integral over a semicircle on the upper half-plane. I have no trouble doing this and getting the (correct) answer of I=πe.
However, I see no reason why one shouldn't be able to do the aforementioned contour integral directly, without switching sinx for the exponential. When, I do this, I get a different answer, and I'm not sure where I'm going wrong.
The integrand has a single simple pole on the upper half-plane at z=i. We can compute the residue:
Res(f,i)=limz→i(z−i)f(z)=limz→izz+isinz=12isinh(1)=i4(e−1e)
By the residue theorem, we get an unexpected answer:
I=2πi Res(f,i)=π2(1e−e)
What's the issue here?
Answer
This interesting question reminds us that Residue theorem is correct only when
limz→a+i∞f(z)=0.
No comments:
Post a Comment