Thursday, January 24, 2019

calculus - Definition of convergence of a nested radical sqrta1+sqrta2+sqrta3+sqrta4+cdots?



In my answer to the recent question Nested Square Roots, @GEdgar correctly raised the issue that the proof is incomplete unless I show that the intermediate expressions do converge to a (finite) limit. One such quantity was the nested radical
1+1+1+1+



To assign a value Y to such an expression, I proposed the following definition. Define the sequence {yn} by:
y1=1,yn+1=1+yn.


Then we say that this expression evaluates to Y if the sequence yn converges to Y.



For the expression (1), I could show that the yn converges to ϕ=(5+1)/2. (To give more details, I showed, by induction, that yn increases monotonically and is bounded by ϕ, so that it has a limit Y<. Furthermore, this limit must satisfy Y=1+Y.) Hence we could safely say (1) evaluates to ϕ, and all seems to be good.



My trouble. Let us now test my proposed idea with a more general expression of the form
a1+a2+a3+a4+


(Note that the linked question involves one such expression, with an=52n.) How do we decide if this expression converges? Mimicking the above definition, we can write:
y1=a1,yn+1=an+1+yn.

However, unrolling this definition, one get the sequence
a1,a2+a1,a3+a2+a1,a4+a3+a2+a1,

but this seems little to do with the expression (2) that we started with.



I could not come up with any satisfactory ways to resolve the issue. So, my question is:





How do I rigorously define when an expression of the form (2) converges, and also assign a value to it when it does converge?




Thanks.


Answer



I would understand it by analogy with continued fractions and look for a limit of a1, a1+a2, a1+a2+a3, ..., a1+a2+an, ...



Each of these is not simply derivable from the previous one, but neither are continued fraction approximants.


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...