In my answer to the recent question Nested Square Roots, @GEdgar correctly raised the issue that the proof is incomplete unless I show that the intermediate expressions do converge to a (finite) limit. One such quantity was the nested radical
√1+√1+√1+√1+⋯
To assign a value Y to such an expression, I proposed the following definition. Define the sequence {yn} by:
y1=√1,yn+1=√1+yn.
Then we say that this expression evaluates to Y if the sequence yn converges to Y.
For the expression (1), I could show that the yn converges to ϕ=(√5+1)/2. (To give more details, I showed, by induction, that yn increases monotonically and is bounded by ϕ, so that it has a limit Y<∞. Furthermore, this limit must satisfy Y=√1+Y.) Hence we could safely say (1) evaluates to ϕ, and all seems to be good.
My trouble. Let us now test my proposed idea with a more general expression of the form
√a1+√a2+√a3+√a4+⋯
(Note that the linked question involves one such expression, with an=52n.) How do we decide if this expression converges? Mimicking the above definition, we can write:
y1=√a1,yn+1=√an+1+yn.
However, unrolling this definition, one get the sequence
√a1,√a2+√a1,√a3+√a2+√a1,√a4+√a3+√a2+√a1,…
but this seems little to do with the expression (2) that we started with.
I could not come up with any satisfactory ways to resolve the issue. So, my question is:
How do I rigorously define when an expression of the form (2) converges, and also assign a value to it when it does converge?
Thanks.
Answer
I would understand it by analogy with continued fractions and look for a limit of √a1, √a1+√a2, √a1+√a2+√a3, ..., √a1+√a2⋯+√an, ...
Each of these is not simply derivable from the previous one, but neither are continued fraction approximants.
No comments:
Post a Comment