This is the exercise 2.8.5 of the book Understanding analysis of Abbott. To put you in context I have that
The sequence of partial sums (smn) is absolutely convergent, and the definition is smn=∑mi=1∑nj=1aij. All the next statements are derived from here.
(snn)→S
|smn−S|<ε,∀n>m≥N
lim
Now it is supposed that I can show that
|s_{mn}-S|<\varepsilon, \forall n>m\ge N\implies |(r_1+r_2+\cdots+r_m)-S|\le\varepsilon
Maybe this is a very dumb question but I cant see where the "\le" comes. So my thought is that the "\le" symbol must appear as a consequence of some order relation between limits but I cant see how, can you enlighten me please? Thank you in advance.
EDIT: to be specific, I cant see why the case is not just
|s_{mn}-S|<\varepsilon, \forall n>m\ge N\implies |(r_1+r_2+\cdots+r_m)-S|<\varepsilon
instead of the stated one. To me if |s_{mn}-S|<\varepsilon holds for any n>m\ge N I cant see why in the limit when n\to\infty this maybe different.
Answer
If for some sequence (x_n) we have x_n < \epsilon for all n and x_n \to x then we can conclude x \leqslant \epsilon. This is easily proved by contradiction assuming x > \epsilon. Then we arrive at a contradiction where infinitely many x_n are in a neighborhood (x- \delta,x+\delta) with x_n > x - \delta > \epsilon.
The inequality need not be strict to allow for the possibility that \epsilon is actually the limit. For example, x_n = 1 - 1/n < 1 for all n but \lim_n (1 - 1/n) = 1.
In your case, the sequence in question is x_n = |s_{mn}-S| and \lim_n s_{mn} = |(r_1 + \ldots + r_m) - L|.
No comments:
Post a Comment