There's something about a geometric series that makes it easily verifiable. Series like ∑10n9n or ∑12n aren't too bad; the variables n are simple and easily reachable, and the fractions are not complex. But I'm having trouble with a series that looks somewhat different:
∑2n92n+1
Its sequence converges, so I know I can apply the learned methods. The first thing I did was extract a constant from the sequence. So I go from the original sequence, which is:
an={2729,459049,8478296,16387420489}
to
an=29(181,26561,4531441,843046721)
I figured out the new sequence as: 2n92n, and after the simplifying the constants, I was able to recreate the series in an almost geometric form of arn−1, with 19 as a and 2n92n as kind of my r. Right now, I have this:
∑19(2n92n)
This is sort of my dilemma. Having the 2n in the denominator is a serious issue; it prevents me from creating an arn−1 formula, and I need an arn−1 formula if I want to test the convergence of this series, at least with the methods I've learned so far. So I'm quite stuck.
Did something go wrong in my calculations? How can I turn this into the proper formula so I can test the series' convergence? Any help is appreciated.
Much Thanks,
-Zolani
Answer
Hint:
92n=(92)n=81n.
:-)
No comments:
Post a Comment