We all know that ∞∑n=11ns converges for s>1 and diverges for s≤1 (Assume s∈R).
I was curious to see till what extent I can push the denominator so that it will still diverges.
So I took ∞∑n=21nlogn and found that it still diverges. (This can be checked by using the well known test that if we have a monotone decreasing sequence, then ∞∑n=2an converges iff ∞∑n=22na2n converges).
No surprises here. I expected it to diverge since logn grows slowly than any power of n.
However, when I take ∞∑n=21n(logn)s, I find that it converges ∀s>1.
(By the same argument as previous).
This doesn't make sense to me though.
If this were to converge, then I should be able to find a s1>1 such that
∞∑n=21ns1 is greater than ∞∑n=21n(logn)s
Doesn't this mean that in some sense logn grows faster than a power of n?
(or)
How should I make sense of (or) interpret this result?
(I am assuming that my convergence and divergence conclusions are right).
Answer
Yes ∞∑n=21n(logn)s is convergent if s>1, we can see that by comparing with the corresponding integral.
As to your other question, if
∞∑n=21ns1 is greater than ∞∑n=21n(logn)s
does not imply logn grows faster than a power of n. You cannot compare them term by term.
What happens is that the first "few" terms of the series dominate (the remainder goes to 0). For a small enough ϵ, we have that logn>nϵ for a sufficient number of (initial) terms, enough for the series without logn to dominate the other.
No comments:
Post a Comment