I am a bit new to logical induction, so I apologize if this question is a bit basic.
I tried proving this by induction:
(n∑k=1k)2≥n∑k=1k2
Starting with the base case n=1:
12≥12
Then to prove that P(n)→P(n+1):
(n+1∑k=1k)2≥n+1∑k=1k2
((n+1)n∑k=1k)2≥(n+1)2n∑k=1k2
(n+1)2(n∑k=1k)2≥(n+1)2n∑k=1k2
Since they're both multiplied by (n+1)2, it's easy to see that if (∑nk=1k)2≥∑nk=1k2, then (n+1)2(∑nk=1k)2≥(n+1)2∑nk=1k2. But if the ≥ were replaced with a ≤, the proof would still be valid, even though it's demonstrably not true.
I can see that it would take strong induction would fix this problem, but if I didn't know by observation that (∑nk=1k)2≤∑nk=1k2 isn't true by observation, how would I know to use strong induction?
Answer
You're not quite on the right track. Your base case is just fine. For your induction step, suppose that (n∑k=1k)2≥n∑k=1k2. Note then that (n+1∑k=1k)2=((n+1)+n∑k=0k)2=(n+1)2+2(n+1)n∑k=1k+(n∑k=1k)2 and that n+1∑k=1k2=(n+1)2+n∑k=1k2. Can you get the rest of the way from there?
Alternately, you can proceed directly, noting that (n∑k=1k)2=(n∑k=1k)(n∑j=1j)=n∑k=1kn∑j=1j=n∑k=1n∑j=1jk=n∑k=1(k2+n∑j=1,j≠kjk)=n∑k=1k2+n∑k=1n∑j=1,j≠kjk≥n∑k=1k2.
No comments:
Post a Comment