I've been able to derive the Euler-Lagrange equation for ∫baF(x,y,y′)dx relatively easily by using the total derivative and integration by parts. However, I was unable to apply the same methods whilst trying to derive the Euler-Lagrange for ∫baF(x,y,y′,y″)dx A proof would be great, but a proper name for this type of equation would also be appreciated (without a term I've found scouring the internet for a Euler-Lagrange of this form to be quite difficult).
Answer
Start by setting up a variation yϵ(x)=y(x)+ϵh(x) where ϵ is some small real number and h(x) is zero on the boundaries. You now have a functional of the form
∫baf(x,yϵ,y′ϵ,y″ϵ)dx.
Differentiate with respect to ϵ and use the Leibniz rule.
ddϵ∫baf(x,yϵ,y′ϵ,y″ϵ)dx=∫ba∂∂ϵf(x,yϵ,y′ϵ,y″ϵ)dx.
Note that
∂∂ϵf(x,yϵ,y′ϵ,y″ϵ)=∂f∂x∂x∂ϵ+∂f∂yϵ∂yϵ∂ϵ+∂f∂y′ϵ∂y′ϵ∂ϵ+∂f∂y″ϵ∂y″ϵ∂ϵ
It follows that
∂∂ϵf(x,yϵ,y′ϵ,y″ϵ)=∂f∂yϵh(x)+∂f∂y′ϵh′(x)+∂f∂y″ϵh″(x)
Your functional now looks like
∫ba(∂f∂yϵh(x)+∂f∂y′ϵh′(x)+∂f∂y″ϵh″(x))dx.
Since you are looking for a stationary point, set it equal to zero and now evaluate it at ϵ=0.
0=∫ba(∂f∂yh(x)+∂f∂y′h′(x)+∂f∂y″h″(x))dx.
Use integration by parts on the second and third terms. I will only perform it on the third term since you state you've derived the simpler case before. This term must be integrated by parts twice.
∫ba∂f∂y″h″(x)dx.
Choose u=∂f∂y″ and v′=h″(x) so u′=ddx(∂f∂y″) and v=h′(x).
The resulting integration by parts is
∂f∂y″h′(x)|ba−∫baddx(∂f∂y″)h′(x)dx
The first term is zero since h(x) is zero on the boundaries. The second term must be integrated by parts again but now with
u=ddx(∂f∂y″)
u′=d2dx2(∂f∂y″)
v=h(x)
v′=h′(x)
I will leave the substitutions to you. The functional now reads:
0=∫ab[∂f∂y−ddx(∂f∂y′)+d2dx2(∂f∂y″)]h(x)dx
This should work for any function h(x) so your Euler-Lagrange equation is
0=∂f∂y−ddx(∂f∂y′)+d2dx2(∂f∂y″)
No comments:
Post a Comment