Tuesday, July 16, 2019

inequality - Proof by induction - Being stuck before being able to prove anything!



I am currently in the process of learning how to prove statements
by induction. For the most part, I understand but I am at most
clueless when it comes to prove some inequalities.




For example, I am having a hard time proving that:

n<2n is true. (Even if it's clear that it is indeed true!)



In the induction step, I am stuck with:

n+1<2n+1



I don't know what would be the assumption I should make from this
statement.




Anyone could point me in the right direction?
Thanks!


Answer



Hint   First prove by induction this lemma: an increasing function stays its initial value, i.e. f(n+1)f(n)f(n)f(0). Now apply this lemma to the function f(n)=2nn, which is increasing by f(n+1)f(n)=2n10. Thus, by the lemma, f(n)f(0)=1, so 2n>n.



Remark   Note that we reduce the proof to the same inequality as in Will's answer: 2n1 (which, itself, may require an inductive proof, depending on the context). But here we've injected the additional insight that the inductive proof of the inequality can be viewed as a special case of the inductive proof of the inequality that an increasing function stays its initial value - which lends much conceptual insight into the induction process. Further, by abstracting out the lemma, we now have a tool that can be reused for analogous inductive proofs (and this simple tool often does the job - see my many prior posts on telescopy for further examples and discussion).


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...