I am currently in the process of learning how to prove statements
by induction. For the most part, I understand but I am at most
clueless when it comes to prove some inequalities.
For example, I am having a hard time proving that:
n<2n is true. (Even if it's clear that it is indeed true!)
In the induction step, I am stuck with:
n+1<2n+1
I don't know what would be the assumption I should make from this
statement.
Anyone could point me in the right direction?
Thanks!
Answer
Hint First prove by induction this lemma: an increasing function stays ≥ its initial value, i.e. f(n+1)≥f(n)⇒f(n)≥f(0). Now apply this lemma to the function f(n)=2n−n, which is increasing by f(n+1)−f(n)=2n−1≥0. Thus, by the lemma, f(n)≥f(0)=1, so 2n>n.
Remark Note that we reduce the proof to the same inequality as in Will's answer: 2n≥1 (which, itself, may require an inductive proof, depending on the context). But here we've injected the additional insight that the inductive proof of the inequality can be viewed as a special case of the inductive proof of the inequality that an increasing function stays ≥ its initial value - which lends much conceptual insight into the induction process. Further, by abstracting out the lemma, we now have a tool that can be reused for analogous inductive proofs (and this simple tool often does the job - see my many prior posts on telescopy for further examples and discussion).
No comments:
Post a Comment