I'm trying to prove the following:
If limn→∞ann=1
then limn→∞sup0≤k≤n|ak−k|n=0.
So, the hypotesis limn→∞ann=1 implies that ∀ϵ>0,∃N:=N(ϵ)∈N such that ∀n≥N implies |an−n|n<ϵ.
Fixed ϵ>0, we have supn≥N|an−n|n<ϵ.
Now, for such N I'd like to prove that sup0≤k≤n|ak−k|n<ϵ ∀n≥N, but I'm stuck in this.
I think that if n≥N then sup0≤k≤n|ak−k|n≤sup0≤k≤n|ak−k|N.
Then,for example, if sup0≤k≤n|ak−k|N=|aN−N|N it's done because of the hypotesis. If sup0≤k≤n|ak−k| is achieved in $0\leq k
Because of the above I think such limit have sense and it's equal to 0 but I don't get how to prove it exactly.
Any kind of help is thanked in advanced.
Answer
Let ε>0 be arbitary. Then there exists N1∈N
such that |an−nn|<ε whenever n≥N1.
Let $M=\max_{0\leq k
Let n≥N be arbitrary. Let 0≤k≤n. If $0\leq k
If N1≤k≤n, then |ak−kn|≤|ak−kk|<ε
because k≥N1. It follows that sup0≤k≤n|ak−kn|<ε.
Hence limnsup0≤k≤n|ak−kn|=0.
No comments:
Post a Comment