Friday, August 24, 2018

real analysis - limnrightarrowinftyfracann=1 implies that limnrightarrowinftysup0leqkleqnfrac|akk|n=0




I'm trying to prove the following:




If limnann=1

then limnsup0kn|akk|n=0.




So, the hypotesis limnann=1 implies that ϵ>0,N:=N(ϵ)N such that nN implies |ann|n<ϵ.



Fixed ϵ>0, we have supnN|ann|n<ϵ.




Now, for such N I'd like to prove that sup0kn|akk|n<ϵ nN, but I'm stuck in this.



I think that if nN then sup0kn|akk|nsup0kn|akk|N.



Then,for example, if sup0kn|akk|N=|aNN|N it's done because of the hypotesis. If sup0kn|akk| is achieved in $0\leq k

Because of the above I think such limit have sense and it's equal to 0 but I don't get how to prove it exactly.



Any kind of help is thanked in advanced.


Answer




Let ε>0 be arbitary. Then there exists N1N
such that |annn|<ε whenever nN1.
Let $M=\max_{0\leq ksuch that MN2<ε. Let N=max(N1,N2).



Let nN be arbitrary. Let 0kn. If $0\leq kwe have that |akkn|MN<ε.
If N1kn, then |akkn||akkk|<ε
because kN1. It follows that sup0kn|akkn|<ε.
Hence limnsup0kn|akkn|=0.



No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...