Q. Use Mean Value Theorem of appropriate order to prove that sin(x)>x−x33!
Now, I know the stated inequality was proved in a previous post, viz. Proof for sin(x)>x−x33! but my question here is what does the problem poser (aka my calculus professor) mean by "mean value theorem of appropriate order" ?
I'm sorry if this is a naive question, I'm a beginner at differential calculus. Thanks for any help!
Answer
Quoting from this linked page,
Now let’s take an arbitrary function f that is n-times differentiable on an open interval containing [x,x+h]. To prove the mean value theorem, we subtracted a linear function so as to obtain a function that satisfied the hypotheses of Rolle’s theorem. Here, the obvious thing to do is to subtract a polynomial p of degree n to obtain a function that satisfies the hypotheses of our higher-order Rolle theorem.
The properties we need p to have are that p(x)=f(x), p′(x)=f′(x), and so on all the way up to p(n−1)(x)=f(n−1)(x), and finally p(x+h)=f(x+h). It turns out that we can more or less write down such a polynomial, once we have observed that the polynomial qk(x)=(u−x)k/k! has the convenient property that q(j)k(x)=0 except when j=k when it is 1. This allows us to build a polynomial that has whatever derivatives we want at x. So let’s do that. Define a polynomial q by
q(u)=f(x)+q1(u)f′(x)+q2(u)f″
Then q^{(k)}(x)=f^{(k)}(x) for k=0,1,\dots,n-1. A more explicit formula for q(u) is
\displaystyle f(x)+(u-x)f'(x)+\frac{(u-x)^2}{2!}f''(x)+\dots+\frac{(u-x)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}f^{(n-1)}(x)
Now q(x+h) doesn’t necessarily equal f(x+h), so we need to add a multiple of (u-x)^n to correct for this. (Doing that won’t affect the derivatives we’ve got at x.) So we want our polynomial to be of the form
p(u)=q(u)+\lambda(u-x)^n
and we want p(x+h)=f(x+h). So we want q(x+h)+\lambda h^n to equal f(x+h), which gives us \lambda=h^{-n}(f(x+h)-q(x+h)). That is,
\displaystyle p(u)=q(u)+\frac{(u-x)^n}{h^n}(f(x+h)-q(x+h))
A quick check: if we substitute in x+h for u we get q(x+h)+(h^n/h^n)(f(x+h)-q(x+h)), which does indeed equal f(x+h).
For the moment, we can forget the formula for p. All that matters is its properties, which, just to remind you, are these.
p is a polynomial of degree n.
p^{(k)}(x)=f^{(k)}(x) for k=0,1,\dots,n-1.
p(x+h)=f(x+h).
The second and third properties tell us that if we set g(u)=f(u)-p(u), then g^{(k)}(x)=0 for k=0,1,\dots,n-1 and g(x+h)=0. Those are the conditions needed for our higher-order Rolle theorem. Therefore, there exists \theta\in(0,1) such that g^{(n)}(x+\theta h)=0, which implies that f^{(n)}(x+\theta h)=p^{(n)}(x+\theta h).
Let us just highlight what we have proved here.
Theorem. Let f be continuous on the interval [x,x+h] and n-times differentiable on an open interval that contains [x,x+h]. Let p be the unique polynomial of degree n such that p^{(k)}(x)=f^{(k)}(x) for k=0,1,\dots,n-1 and p(x+h)=f(x+h). Then there exists \theta\in(0,1) such that f^{(n)}(x+\theta h)=p^{(n)}(x+\theta h).
Note that since p is a polynomial of degree n, the function p^{(n)} is constant. In the case n=1, the constant is \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}, the gradient of the line joining (x,f(x)) to (x+h,f(x+h)), and the theorem is just the mean value theorem.
No comments:
Post a Comment