Consider the functional equation f(x+yn)=f(x)+[f(y)]n where f:R→R and n is given integer >1. This equation was discussed yesterday and it was shown that f is necessarily additive. Assuming continuity it was concluded that f(x)≡cx for some c. [ Necessarily c is an n-th root of unity]. If n is even then the given functional equation gives f(x+yn)≥f(x) which easily leads to the conclusion that f is an increasing function. It follows that f is Borel measurable; since any Borel measurable additive function if of the type f(x)≡cx the assumption that f is continuous is not necessary. My question is what can be said for n odd? Can one use some trick to prove that f is necessarily Borel measurable? Or is there a counter-example? Discontinuous additive functions are constructed using Hamel basis but I am unable to use this method to construct a counter-example. I would appreciate receiving any ideas about this question.
Answer
Here's a generalization of i707107's argument that is actually a bit simpler, as long as I didn't make any mistakes:
You have
f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)
and
n∑i=0(ni)f(xiyn−i)=f((x+y)n)=f(x+y)n=(f(x)+f(y))n=n∑i=0(ni)f(x)if(y)n−i.
Taking y rational, we have f(xiyn−i)=yn−if(xi) and f(y)=yf(1), so
n∑i=0(ni)yn−i[f(xi)−f(1)n−if(x)i]=0
As this is a polynomial of degree n that is 0 for all rationals, it is identically 0, so
f(xi)=f(1)n−if(x)i
for all 0≤i≤n. Originally, we had f(1)=f(1)n, so f(1)∈{−1,0,1}. If f(1)=0, we have f(xi)=0, so f(x)≡0. Otherwise, we have
f(x2)=f(1)n−2f(x)2=f(1)f(x)2
f(x+y2)=f(x)+f(y2)=f(x)+f(1)f(y)2.
If f(1)=1, this means f is increasing, and if f(1)=−1 this means f is decreasing. Either way, f is not everywhere dense, so f(x)=cx for some c and all x. The observation that f(1)=±1 means f(x)=x and f(x)=−x are our only other solutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment