I've got another problem with my CalcII homework. The problem deals with trig substitution in the integral for integrals following this pattern: √a2+x2. So, here's the problem:
∫2−2dx4+x2
I graphed the function and because of symmetry, I'm using the integral: 2∫20dx4+x2
Since the denominator is not of the form: √a2+x2 but is basically what I want, I ultimately decided to take the square root of the numerator and denominator:
2∫20√1√4+x2dx=2∫20dx√4+x2
From there, I now have, using the following: tanθ=x2=>x=2tanθ=>dx=2sec2θdθ
2∫20dx4+x2dx=√2∫20dx√4+x2dx=√2∫202sec2(θ)√4+4tan2(θ)dθ=√2∫202sec2(θ)2√1+tan2(θ)dθ=√2∫20sec2(θ)√sec2(θ)dθ=√2∫20sec2(θ)sec(θ)dθ=√2∫20sec(θ)dθ=√2[lnsec(θ)+tan(θ)|20]=√2[ln√4+x22+x2|20]
I'm not sure if I've correctly made the integral look like the pattern it's supposed to have. That is, trig substitutions are supposed to be for √a2+x2 (in this case that is, there are others). This particular problem is an odd numbered problem and the answer is supposed to be π4. I'm not getting that. So, the obvious question is, what am I doing wrong? Also note, I had trouble getting the absolute value bars to produce for the ln: don't know what I did wrong there either.
Thanks for any help,
Andy
Answer
Hint: you can cut your work considerably by using the trig substitution directly into the proper integral, and proceeding (no place for taking the square root of the denominator):
You have 2∫20dx4+x2and NOT2∫20dx√4+x2
But that's good, because this integral (on the left) is what you have and is already in in the form where it is appropriate to use the following substitution:
Let x=2tanθ, which you'll see is standard for integrals of this form.
As suggested by Andrew in the comments, we can arrive at his suggested result, and as shown in Wikipedia:
Given any integral in the form
∫dxa2+x2
we can substitute
x=atan(θ),dx=asec2(θ)dθ,θ=arctan(xa)
Substituting gives us:
∫dxa2+x2=∫asec2(θ)dθa2+a2tan2(θ)=∫asec2(θ)dθa2(1+tan2(θ))=∫asec2(θ)dθa2sec2(θ)=∫dθa=θa+C=1aarctan(xa)+C
Note, you would have gotten precisely the correct result had you not taken the square root of sec2θ in the denominator, i.e., if you had not evaluated the integral of the square root of your function.
No comments:
Post a Comment