I have been trying to evaluate
f(x)≡∞∫0−ln(1−x2cosh2(t))dt
for x∈[0,1] and similar integrals recently. I know that
∞∫0dtcoshz(t)=2z−2Γ2(z2)Γ(z)
holds for Re(z)>0, so by expanding the logarithm I found that
f(x)=12∞∑n=1(2n)!!n2(2n−1)!!x2n.
But the right-hand side is the power series of the arcsine squared, so f(x)=arcsin2(x).
On the other hand, the substitution u=xcosh(t) in the original integral leads to the representation
f(x)=x∫0−xln(1−u2)u√x2−u2du,
for which Mathematica (or WolframAlpha if you're lucky) gives the correct result.
I would like to compute this integral without resorting to the above power series and thereby find an alternative proof for the expansion. I have tried to transform the integral into the usual form
arcsin2(x)=x∫02arcsin(y)√1−y2du
and thought about using the relations
arcsin(x)=arctan(x√1−x2)=2arctan(x1+√1−x2),
but to no avail. Maybe the solution is trivial and I just cannot see it at the moment, maybe it is not. Anyway, I would be grateful for any ideas or hints.
Answer
I have finally managed to put all the pieces together, so here's a solution that does not use the power series:
Let u=xv to obtain
f(x)=1∫0−ln(1−x2v2)v√1−v2dv.
Now we can differentiate under the integral sign (justified by the dominated convergence theorem) and use the substitution v=√1−w2. Then the derivative is given by
f′(x)=2x1∫0v(1−x2v2)√1−v2dv=2x1∫0dw1−x2+x2w2=2√1−x2arctan(x√1−x2)=2arcsin(x)√1−x2
for x∈(0,1). Since f(0)=0, integration yields
f(x)=f(0)+x∫02arcsin(y)√1−y2dy=arcsin2(x)
for x∈[0,1] as claimed.
No comments:
Post a Comment