Saturday, April 23, 2016

calculus - Evaluate the definite integral intinfty0fracx,dxex1 using contour integration


My friend and I have been trying weeks to evaluate the integral



0xdxex1.



We have together tried 23 contours, and all have failed.


We already know how to solve this with infinite sums (i.e., using the zeta function and the Basel problem), but we can't figure out how to solve it using contour integration methods.


We already know the answer is π26.


Answer




I would have guessed this was a duplicate, but I wasn't able to find another instance of this question during a cursory search.


Hint The denominator has period 2πi, which suggests using the following contour Γϵ,R, 0<ϵ<π, ϵ<R, (for which an illustration was already drawn for an answer to the similar question linked by Zacky in the comments):


enter image description here


The key trick here, which we apply with the benefit of hindsight, is to evaluate instead the similar integral Γϵ,Rz2dzez1. The interior of Γϵ,R contains no poles, so this integral vanishes. Thus, parameterizing the constituent arcs of the contour gives 0=Rϵx2dxex1A+2π0(R+iy)2idyeR+iy1B+ϵR(x+2πi)2dxex1C+π/20(2πi+ϵeiθ)2iϵeiθdθeϵeiθ1D+ϵ2πϵ(iy)2idyeiy1E+0π/2(ϵeiθ)2iϵeiθdθeϵeiθ1F.()



A standard bounding argument shows that B0 as R. Computing the first terms of the Taylor series gives that the integrand of D is 4π2i+O(ϵ), so D=2π3i+O(ϵ), and similarly F=O(ϵ) (in fact, the integrand is analytic at 0, which implies this without any more computation). Now, expanding the integrand of C gives Rϵx2dxex1=Rϵx2dxex14πiRϵxdxex1+4π2Rϵdxex1. The first term on the r.h.s. cancels A, and after taking appropriate limits the second term will be constant multiple of the integral 0xdxex1 of interest. The third term diverges as ϵ0, and it turns out that the diverging part of this term in ϵ is canceled by the diverging part of E, but we can avoid dealing with this issue directly by passing to the imaginary part of (). Computing gives ImE=122πϵϵy2dy=43π3+O(ϵ), so taking the limits ϵ0,R of the imaginary part of () leaves 0=4π0xdxex1+2π343π3, and rearranging gives the desired result, 0xdxex1=π26.



No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...