My lecturer was talking today (in the context of probability, more specifically Kolmogorov's axioms) about the additive property of functions, namely that:
f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)
I've been trying to find what functions satisfy this. Intuition says that, for functions over R, the only functions should be of the form f(x)=ax for some real a. Unfortunately I've only shown this is true when the domain of the function is the rational multiples of a given real number.
My question is if it is possible to extend this result (that f(x)=ax given additivity) to the real numbers, possibly without assuming the continuity of f. It seems to me that additivity introduces so many constrains on a function that nothing but the trivial case would be able to sneak through. The following is a summary of my thoughts to date, though they're obviously long and not 'compulsory reading'. :)
When x is rational - Preliminary Investigation
It is not hard to see that:
f(x+x+x)=3f(x)
and more generally, for a∈N,
f(ax)=af(x)
It is not too hard to prove (well, it took half a bus trip ... ) that this also applies first for a∈Z and then for a∈Q, (for the latter you just need to consider a=m/n and then note that:
f(mnx)=mf(xn)=mn⋅nf(xn)=mn⋅f(nxn)=mn⋅f(x)
The reason this little equation is cool is that we can set x=1 and get:
f(a)=a⋅f(1)
which is equivalent to what was expected intuitively, namely (after changing a to y and f(1) to a)
f(y)=a⋅y
as long as y is rational
y is a rational multiple of a real number
But we can do a bit better than that. If we substitute in x=√2 or any other real number in f(ax)=af(x) (which we know for rational a), you can conduct the exact same argument above and show that, for instance
f(y)=(f(√2)√2)⋅y=a⋅y
Whenever y=mn√2 i.e. whenever y is a rational multiple of √2. Note however, that the value of the coefficient a (i.e. the slope of the line) is apparently completely unrelated to the value taken in the case where y is purely rational.
What I'm actually asking
We still haven't shown that f(x)=ax for all x∈R, as the slope of the line may change depending on what real number we are taking rational multiples of. As far as I've shown now, we might have f(x)=x when x is rational, f(x)=3x when x is a rational multiple of √2, etc.
I still feel that f(x)=ax for all x∈R. One reason for thinking this comes from noting that f(2)=f(2−√2)+f(√2)
2, 2−√2 and √2 are not rational multiples of each other, however the equation above gives a restraint on the slopes of the lines formed by their rational multiples (which we'll call a1,a2 and a3 for the slopes on the rational multiples of 2,2−√2 and √2 respectively). We have 2a1=(2−√2)a2+√2a3
There's so many constraints here - all the rational multipes have the same coefficient, whenever 2 (or more) numbers which aren't rational multiples of each other are added together we get another constraint on their coefficients. The trivial solution is just thatf(x)=ax
over x∈R and I really struggle to see how any other solution could possible squeeze through all these constraints.
Is there an additive function on R not of the form f(x)=ax?
No comments:
Post a Comment