I'm questioning myselfas to why indeterminate forms arise, and why limits that apparently give us indeterminate forms can be resolved with some arithmetic tricks. Why limx→+∞x+1x−1=+∞+∞
and if I do a simple operation,
limx→+∞x(1+1x)x(1−1x)=limx→+∞(1+1x)(1−1x)=1
I understand the logic of the process, but I can't understand why we get different results by "not" changing anything.
Answer
So you're looking at something of the form
limx→+∞f(x)=limx→+∞g(x)h(x)
and if this limit exists, say the limit it L, then it doesn't matter how we rewrite f(x). However, it's possible you can write f(x) in different ways; e.g. as the quotient of different functions:
f(x)=g1(x)h1(x)=g2(x)h2(x)
The limit of f either exists or not, but it's possible that the individual limits in the numerator and denominator exist, or not. More specifically, it's possible that
limx→+∞g1(x)andlimx→+∞h1(x)
limx→+∞f(x)=limx→+∞g1(x)h1(x)=limx→+∞g2(x)h2(x)=limx→+∞g2(x)limx→+∞h2(x)=⋯
When you try to apply that rule but the individual limits do not exist, you "go back" and try something else, such as rewriting/simplifying f(x); this is precisely what happens:
limx→+∞f(x)=limx→+∞x+1x−1≠limx→+∞(x+1)limx→+∞(x−1)=+∞+∞=?=limx→+∞1+1x1−1x=limx→+∞(1+1x)limx→+∞(1−1x)=1+01+0=1
No comments:
Post a Comment