Tuesday, May 10, 2016

exponentiation - 0's Exponents are impossible?



I've had something that's been bugging me, and I tried research and asked my math teacher. None had sufficient answers. The concept of 0 is that when 0 goes to any exponent except for 0, it becomes 0. For example,



03=0, but 00= undefined


However, the proof that 00 is undefined is shown thus: 0x ... (divided by) = 0(xx)=00 = undefined 0x


You can apply this to any exponent though, such as: 06 ... = 06=0 and 03=0, so this expression is equal to 0/0, which should be 03 undefined, right?


Am I doing something wrong here? Please help! Gil


Answer



One should not say "equals undefined"; one should say "is undefined". The is the "is" of predication, not the "is" of equality.


00 is indeterminate in the sense that if f(x) and g(x) both approach 0 as xa then f(x)g(x) could approach any positive number or 0 or depending on which functions f and g are.


But in some contexts it is important that 00 be taken to be 1. One of those contexts is in the identity ez=n=0znn!. This fails to hold when z=0 unless 00=1, since the first term of the series is then 000!.


In combinatorial enumeration it is also important in some contexts that 00 is 1, for the same reason 20 is 1: if you multiply by something 0 times, it's the same as multiplying by 1. That is also one way of looking at the reason why 0! is 1.


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...