Tuesday, November 14, 2017

real analysis - Proof square root of 4 is not irrational.



I was recently working on a question essentially worded in the following way:





Where does a proof of 4 being irrational fall apart when we try to apply the same principles used for proving that 2 is irrational.




I attempted by making the same (in this case, intuitively correct) assumptions that led to a contradiction in the case of 2:




  1. 4 is a rational number and can be written as mn where n0


  2. mn is in lowest reduced terms; i.e. m and n are co-prime due to definition of rational numbers





Then I took the following steps:



m2=4n2



m2=2(2n2)



Thus, m2 is even m is even and can be written as 2k.



m2=4k2=4n2




k=n



Thus, k is a factor of both m and n, contradicting the second assumption that I made (m and n are co-prime).



Although I understand intuitively that this is not the case, doesn't this show that 4 is irrational?


Answer



You have proven that n=k and m=2k. In the case that m and n are coprime, set k=1.


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...