I'm trying to prove that n∣(nCr) for all r (1≤r≤n−1) if and only if n is prime.
Now proving that if n is prime then n∣(nCr) is pretty easy, but how would you go about proving that n∣(nCr) only if n is prime?
Could you show that if n is not prime, then there exists an r such that n does not divide nCr? If so how would you go about doing that? I thought it would be easy but then I realized that for some r,n∣(nCr) even if n isn't prime which made things a little bit more complicated.
I've managed to show that n∣(n−1)! for non-primes greater than or equal to 6, which means that despite n always canceling out with a product of factors in r!(n−r)! in some cases, there will be another pair of factors that cancel out with the n in (n−1)!, and sometimes there won't be. Maybe there's some kind of pattern but I can't find it unfortunately.
(I'd prefer a method that doesn't use undergraduate and above level maths)
Answer
Suppose n is not prime, and let n=mp where p is a prime. Then n\not|\binom{n}{p}, since
\binom{n}{p}=n \bigg[\frac{(n-1)!}{p!(n-p)!}\bigg]=n\bigg[\frac{(mp-1)!}{p!((m-1)p)!}\bigg]=n\bigg[\frac{(mp-1)(mp-2)(mp-3)\cdots((m-1)p+1)}{p!}\bigg], where the expression in brackets is not an integer since
(mp-1)(mp-2)(mp-3)\cdots((m-1)p+1) is not divisible by p, while p! is.
No comments:
Post a Comment