Friday, June 23, 2017

real analysis - What about of this integral involving the Gudermannian function inti0nftyfracoperatornamegd(x)ex1mathrmdx?




The Gudermannian function is related to the exponential function, see for example the MathWorld's article Gudermannian. From this idea I was playing with the integral 0enxgd(x)dx
where n1 are integers, when by summation over all these n, I wondered about the integral 0gd(x)ex1dx.



Using Wolfram Alpha online calculator I know the indefinite integral enxgd(x)dx, and also approximations (see the code, or similars, 10 digits of int gd(x)/(e^x-1)dx, from x=0 to infinity) for which searching with Wolfram Alpha online calculator for a closed-form of the mentioned approximations, I got the following conjecture.



Claim(?). Seems that 0gd(x)ex1dx=2Kπlog24,
being K the Catalan's constant.





Question. Is it possible to get a proof of previous conjecture (C)? Many thanks.



Answer



We first notice that



0gd(x)ex1dx=01ex1(x0dycoshy)dx=01coshy(ydxex1)dy=20log(1ey)ey+eydy=2π40log(1tanθ)dθ.



The last integral is our starting point. We introduce two tricks to evaluate this.



Step 1. Notice that tan(π4θ)=1tanθ1+tanθ. So by the substitution θπ4θ, it follows that



π40log(1+tanθ)dθ=π40log(21+tanθ)dθ




and hence both integrals have the common value π8log2. Applying the same idea to our integral, it then follows that



2π40log(1tanθ)dθ=2π40log(2tanθ1+tanθ)dθ=2π40logtanθdθπ4log2.



Step 2. In order to compute the last integral, we notice that for θR with cosθ0, we have




log|tanθ|=log|1+e2iθ1e2iθ|=Relog(1+e2iθ1e2iθ)=Re(n=11+(1)nne2inθ)=k=022k+1cos(4k+2)θ.



So by term-wise integration, we obtain




2π40logtanθdθ=k=042k+1π40cos(4k+2)θdθ=2k=0(1)k(2k+1)2=2K,



where K is the Catalan's constant.


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...