Given an elementary abelian p-group G . Can someone please explain me why it can be seen as a vector space over Zp ? It should be elementary but I can't figure it out.
As a consequence, can someone please give me some advice for possible papers / theorem that prove some kind of linear independence in the group context when regarding a group as a vector space? (something like proving that some elements in a group G are linearly independent mod ϕ(G) when ϕ(G) is the Frattini -group of G ) .
Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance !
Answer
In an elementary abelian p-group every nontrivial element has order p, so by the classification of finitely generated abelian groups it is isomorphic to (Z/pZ)n=Fnp for some n. An element of Fnp is just a vector with entries in Fp and these obviously form a vector space over Fp.
For another way to see this note that every abelian group G is a Z-module by (n,g)↦gn, i.e. there is a canonical homomorphism Z→End(G),n↦[g↦gn]. If G is an elementary p-group then gp=1 for all g∈G, so p is in the kernel and the homomorphism induces Z/pZ→End(G) which equips G with the structure of a Z/pZ vector space.
Yet another way (the most direct one) is to define Fp×G→G,(¯a,g)↦ga and to verify that this satisfies the axioms of a vector space (where the addition is the group operation). This is well-defined since if a≡b(modp) then ga=gb where we are using that gp=1 for all g∈G.
For an application involving linear independece let G be a finite p-group (not necessarily abelian) and Φ(G) its Frattini subgroup, i.e. the intersection of all maximal subgroups. Then Φ(G) is normal in G and the Frattini quotient G/Φ(G) is an elementary abelian p-group, hence may be viewed as a vector space over Fp by the above considerations.
Claim: The size of a minimal set of generators of G equals dimFp(G/Φ(G)).
Proof: Let {x1,…,xn} be a minimal set of generators of G. Then obviously the residue classes {¯x1,…,¯xn} generate G/Φ(G) as an Fp-vector space, so it suffices to show that they are linearly independent over Fp. Assume for contradiction that ¯x1a1⋯¯xnan=¯1 is a linear relation in G/Φ(G) where at least one ai is not divisible by p, say a1≢. By exponentiating both sides with the mod p inverse of a_1 we find \overline{x_1} \cdot \overline{x_2}^{b_2}\cdots \overline{x_n}^{b_n} = \overline{1} for certain b_i, hence x_1 = g \cdot x_n^{-b_n}\cdots x_2^{-b_2} for some g \in \Phi(G). This shows that \{g, x_2,\ldots,x_n\} is also a generating set of G. We show that we can remove g and still generate all of G, contradicting the minimality of our initial generating set. Assume \{x_2,\ldots,x_n\} generates a proper subgroup of G, say H. Then H is contained in a maximal subgroup M of G. By definition of \Phi(G), we have g \in M, hence the subgroup generated by \{g,x_2,\ldots,x_n\} is also contained in M, contradicting the fact that it generates all of G.
No comments:
Post a Comment