Use integration along ∂Q of Q=[−R,R]+i[0,Y] to show that for all Y≥0 it holds that
∫∞−∞exp(−(x+iY)2) dx=∫∞−∞exp(−x2) dx.
Similiar to one of my other questions referring to a rectangle I was going to rewrite ∂Q as four curves but the integrands became really complicated. Using the bottom curve of the rectangle I got γ(t)=(1−t)(−R)+tR=R(2t−1) hence
∫γexp(−(x+iY)2) dx=∫10exp(−(R(2t−1)+iY)2)⋅2R dt
which seems like a very tough integral. I was thinking of a similiar (and more simple) curve ˆγ using another parametrisation to get easier integrals.
What would be your suggested approach for this problem?
Results of some attempts after getting some help
After much help of πr8 I have the following results for all four curves thus far
γ1(t)=(1−t)(−R)+tR=R(2t−1)γ′1(t)=2R∫γ1exp(−(x+iY)2)dx=∫10exp(−(R(2t−1)⏟u+iY)2)⋅2Rdt=∫R−Rexp(−(u+iY)2)du
γ2(t)=(1−t)R+t(R+iY)=R+tiYγ′2(t)=iY∫γ2exp(−(x+iY)2)dx=∫10exp(−(R+tiY⏟u+iY)2)⋅iYdt=∫R+iYRexp(−(u+iY)2)du
γ3(t)=(1−t)(R+iY)+t(−R+iY)=R(1−2t)+iYγ′3(t)=−2R∫γ3exp(−(x+iY)2)dx=∫10exp(−(R(1−2t)+iY⏟u+iY)2)⋅(−2R)dt=∫−R+iYR+iYexp(−(u+iY)2)du
So far I could rewrite all integrals to have the same boundaries as the curves used to deduce them. For the last curve however this wasn't as straight-forward as for the other ones (I was eager to have four identical integrands) and I had to use another substitution yielding
γ4(t)=(1−t)(−R+iY)+t(−R)=−R−(t−1)iYγ′4(t)=−iY∫γ4exp(−(x+iY)2)dx=∫10exp(−(−R−tiY+iY⏟u)2)⋅iYdt=∫−R−R+iYexp(−u2)du.
Is there anything salvageable in the above equations?
Answer
Since z↦exp(−z2) is an entire function, by Cauchy's theorem the integral ∫∂Qexp(−z2)dz is zero. On the other hand,
∫∂Qexp(−z2)dz=(∫R−R+∫R+iYR−∫R+iY−R+iY−∫−R+iY−R)exp(−z2)dz
Thus
∫R+iY−R+iYexp(−z2)dz=∫R−Rexp(−x2)dx+∫R+iYRexp(−z2)dz−∫−R+iY−Rexp(−z2)dz
Now, the integral along the vertical edges of Q are O(exp(−R2)) as R→∞. Indeed, consider the vertical edge from R to R+iY, parametrized by z=R+it,0≤t≤Y.
|∫R+iYRexp(−z2)dz|=|∫Y0exp{−(R+it)2}idt|≤∫Y0exp{−(R2−t2)}dt=Ce−R2
where C=∫Y0exp(t2)dt. Similarly, |∫−R+iY−Rexp(−z2)dz|≤Ce−R2. Hence, by (1),
∫R+iY−R+iYexp(−z2)dz=∫R−Rexp(−x2)dx+O(exp(−R2))
Parametrizing the horizontal edge [−R+iY,R+iY] via z=x+iY, −R≤x≤R, we have ∫R+iY−R+iYexp(−z2)dz=∫R−Rexp(−(x+iY)2)dx. Therefore, (2) becomes
∫R−Rexp(−(x+iY)2)dx=∫R−Rexp(−x2)dx+O(exp(−R2)) Letting R→∞ in (3), the result is established.
No comments:
Post a Comment