I'm having some trouble understanding a proof on Naoki Sato's notes on Number Theory and I was wondering if you guys could give me some help. The problem is that I don't understand the last implication on the proof for example 1.1
Example 1.1. Let x and y be integers. Prove that 2x + 3y is divisible by 17 iff 9x + 5y is divisible by 17.
Solution. 17 | (2x + 3y) ⇒ 17 | [13(2x + 3y)], or 17 | (26x + 39y) ⇒ 17 | (9x + 5y)
conversely, 17 | (9x + 5y) ⇒ 17 | [4(9x + 5y)], or 17 | (36x + 20y) ⇒ 17 | (2x + 3y).
My problem is that I don't understand how does 17 | (26x + 39y) imply 17 | (9x + 5y). If you could elaborate on this step I would be most grateful.
I'm sorry if this is an obvious question but I am a beginner and I just can't get it.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Answer
If 17∣(26x+39y), and 17∣(−17x−34y), then we may add to get 17∣9x+5y. In general the rule is, if p∣a and p∣b, then p∣(a+b).
No comments:
Post a Comment