Monday, July 11, 2016

number theory - Understanding a proof that 2x+3y is divisible by 17 iff 9x+5y is divisible by 17




I'm having some trouble understanding a proof on Naoki Sato's notes on Number Theory and I was wondering if you guys could give me some help. The problem is that I don't understand the last implication on the proof for example 1.1




Example 1.1. Let x and y be integers. Prove that 2x + 3y is divisible by 17 iff 9x + 5y is divisible by 17.



Solution. 17 | (2x + 3y) ⇒ 17 | [13(2x + 3y)], or 17 | (26x + 39y) ⇒ 17 | (9x + 5y)
conversely, 17 | (9x + 5y) ⇒ 17 | [4(9x + 5y)], or 17 | (36x + 20y) ⇒ 17 | (2x + 3y).




My problem is that I don't understand how does 17 | (26x + 39y) imply 17 | (9x + 5y). If you could elaborate on this step I would be most grateful.




I'm sorry if this is an obvious question but I am a beginner and I just can't get it.



Thanks for your help in advance.


Answer



If 17(26x+39y), and 17(17x34y), then we may add to get 179x+5y. In general the rule is, if pa and pb, then p(a+b).


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...