Wednesday, October 7, 2015

linear algebra - Proving that Matrix is a Unit




If AMn(F), I have to show that A is a unit only if AB=I or BA=I for some BMn(F).



I am not sure how to approach this at all since this fact was pretty intuitive to me. One way I am thinking this is using the fact that this basically means prove that A is invertible if AB=BA=I. A hint that was given, however, was that if V and W are finite dimensional vector spaces, T:VW is isomorphic only when it is injective (or only when it is surjective). This hint is completely throwing me off on how to do this question. Can somebody help? Thanks.



Answer



A ring R (with unity) is called Dedekind-finite if for all x,yR we have xy=0yx=0.



I agree with @darijgrinberg - the only way I can understand the OP's question is to assume it is a slightly mis-phrased version of the following:



Show AMn(F) is a unit if we are only given that there is a BMn(F) for which either AB=I or BA=I.



We further presume, from a convention of notation, and the mention of vector spaces in the hint, that F is a field. So OP's question (on this interpretation) can be rephrased in a more lucid fashion as:



Show that Mn(F) is a Dedekind-finite ring.




The n-dimensional matrix algebra Mn(F) is isomorphic to the algebra of linear transformations on the vector space Fn. Thus multiplication of elements is interpreted as the composition of two linear transformations.



This gives us the three crucial properties, from which the Dedekind-finite property can be inferred:



(a) every element can be uniquely assigned a rank, which is an integer between 0 and n. This rank is in fact equal to the dimension of the image when the linear transformation corresponding to the element (wrt some pre-chosen basis for Fn) is applied to the whole of Fn



(b) an element is a unit (invertible) if and only if it has maximal rank (n)



(c) the rank function ρ satisfies:

X,YMn(F)ρ(XY)max



Note 1: in case the field F is finite, then the Dedekind-finiteness of M_n(F) is a consequence of an ingenious theorem of Kaplansky that if an element a of a ring has a left (right) inverse, then either a is a unit or it has an infinite number of distinct left(right) inverses.



Note 2: the Dedekind-finiteness of M_n(F) also follows from a more general result, that any Noetherian ring is Dedekind-finite. To show this, suppose we are given that ab = 1.



the map L_a:R \to R defined by L_a(x) = ax is obviously linear. it is also surjective, since for any r \in R we have L_a(br) = abr = r. Let K_n be the kernel of L_a^n. Obviously the K_n are ideals and: K_1 \subset K_2 \subset\dots. The Noetherian condition shows that this chain stabilizes after a finite number of steps, say in K_n. Since L_a^n is surjective there must be an x such that L_a^n(x)=ba-1. but clearly L_a(ba-1) = 0 so x \in K_{n+1} = K_n, so ba-1 = L_n(x) = 0 and ba=1


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f \colon A \rightarrow B and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...