We are given the sets A=(1,2]∪((3,4)∩Q) and B=(1,2)∪((3,4)∩Q) with the standard order ≤ of the reals.
Are they order-isomorphic? Meaning, is there a bijective function f:A→B such that a1≤a2∈A implies f(a1)≤f(a2)∈B?
Answer: There isn't.
The reason for this (this is what the teacher said) is that the set A∗={x∈A||{a∈A|a≥x}|≤ℵ0} has a minimal value with the standard order. While B∗={x∈B||{b∈B|b≥x}|≤ℵ0} does not.
Firstly, I don't understand at all why this is true. And second, even if it is true, why does that imply that there isn't an order perserving isomorphism between A and B? I don't see the relation between the 2 statements.
Answer
The difference between A and B is what happens with '2'. There is a hint, which is to prove that there is no order isomorphism, so we try to find something that is true in A and not true for B and that concerns orders.
Little digression as an example of what your teacher is trying to do : is there an homeomorphism between an infinite line and an infinite plane ? Answer : no. Because if you remove a point from a line you have 2 different connex sets, whereas this does not hold with a plane.
Here the teacher tries to find such a property (with sets that are countable/not countable) that should hold in both A and B if there was such an order isomorphism
No comments:
Post a Comment