Show that limn→∞supk≥n(1+ak+1ak)k≥e
Let sk=(1+ak+1ak)k
Then sk≥0 as otherwise ak+1<−1. Also, supk≥n{sk} is nonincreasing on n.
Assume limn→∞supk≥n{sk}=l<e. For 0<ε<e−l, choose N such that l≤supk≥n{sk}<e−ε for all n>N.
We know that limn→∞(n+1n)n=e
Then for M=max{N,N′}, $ \sup_{k \geq n}\{s_k\}
Here I wanted to get some sort of contradiction but I'm not really sure how. I know that an cannot have a limit A as then 0≤limn→∞an+1<limn→∞(1+1n)an−1,
And an cannot be bounded by d as we would have, for n>2d, an+1<an(1+1n)−1<d(1+12d)−1=d−12. Continuing in this way there would be an an<0.
I was thinking of using the fact that the superior limit is the largest partial limit.
What should I do next or should I use a different method?
Answer
Let us start from your conclusion $s_{n}
∀n≥M,1n+1<ann−an+1n+1
This implies, by adding these inequalities
∀m≥M,m−1∑k=M+11k+1<aM+1M+1−amm<aM+1M+1
and letting m tend to +∞ we get a contradiction. Thus the desired limit superior is larger or equal to e.
No comments:
Post a Comment