Monday, February 6, 2017

linear algebra - Proving that (An)1=(A1)n for invertible matrix A.



I have seen a proof of the fact that for an invertible matrix A, An is also invertible and
(An)1=(A1)n.



The proof was by induction and it was mentioned that one has to use induction because one has that it is true for all n.



I am wondering why one has to use induction. Why can't one just say that
(An)(A1)n=(AA1)n=In=I


where one has used that A and A1 by definition commute. Isn't this enough to show that An is also invertible and (An)1=(A1)n?


Answer



your proof is fine (to me, at least). I think if you wanted to be super rigorous, you'd need to use induction anyways to fully show that (An)(A1)n=(AA1)n because even though A and A1 commute, you need to be sure it holds for arbitrarily large products of the two.




Honestly though, like I said, your proof is fine how it is.


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...