How can we really use u-substitution method for finding integrals if "dx" in the integral is just a notation, not a number. At first we say that it is just a part of notation, but then, we use it as a number to find "du" (although it is also just a part a notation and we can't really find it for a new integral which we write after substitution). Maybe I misunderstood something. Thanks.
Answer
Let's do the proof for indefinite integrals:
∫f(u(x))u′(x)dx=∫f(u)du
Let g be an antiderivative of f on some interval D (so g′(x)=f(x) on D), and let X be another interval and u:X→D a differentiable function that we will use for substitution.
Now, by solving the RHS, we obtain ∫f(u)du=g(u)+C, and by substituting u, we obtain g(u(x))+C. Now, take the derivative on the domain X:
(g(u(x)+C)′=g′(u(x))u′(x)=f(u(x))u′(x)
(the chain rule), so the result we got by solving the RHS satisfies the LHS too: g(u(x))+C is an antiderivative of f(u(x))u′(x).
The reverse is true because all the other antiderivatives in LHS differ from this one by a constant (because X is connected), and can be obtained by varying the constant on the RHS.
The condition that X is an interval cannot be weakened to include sets that are not connected, because the LHS could have different constants applied to the multiple connected components of X, while the RHS has a single constant.
No comments:
Post a Comment