Saturday, April 27, 2019

field theory - Prove that x3+2y3+4z3equiv6xyzpmod7Rightarrowxequivyequivzequiv0pmod7



[Old] Wants: x3+2y3+4z36xyz(mod7)xyz0(mod7)



[Old] My attempt: With modular arithmetic, I can show that if x0, then y0, and z0; if x0, then xyz0(mod7).



But I don't see how to show that x3+2y3+4z36xyz0(mod7) when x,y,z0, other than plugging in all possible nonzero values of x,y,z(mod7) to derive a contradiction. I hope to prove the desired result with least effort.



Update: As @Lubin pointed out in his answer, "the Norm of a nonzero element of the big field is necessarily nonzero in the base field". But I cannot find a reference on this specific statement. Could anyone tell me why is the quoted sentence above true?


Answer




Someone played a dirty trick on you.



The form x36xyz+2y3+4z3 is the “norm form” for the extension F73F7. That is, if you take a generator ζ=32 of the big field, which is all right, since X32 is irreducible over F7, then the Norm of x+yζ+zζ2 is w=x36xyz+2y3+4z3, when x,y,zF7. But the Norm of a nonzero element of the big field is necessarily nonzero in the base field. And that does it.



How did I know this? Many hand computations of the Norm, over the years. Pencil and paper, friends, pencil and paper.


No comments:

Post a Comment

analysis - Injection, making bijection

I have injection f:AB and I want to get bijection. Can I just resting codomain to f(A)? I know that every function i...